THE lawyers of US
Marine Lance Cpl. Joseph Scott Pemberton rested its presentation of evidence
after a forensic pathologist disputed on Tuesday the official cause of death of
transgender woman Jeffrey “Jennifer” Laude who was found dead in an Olongapo City hotel in October 2014.
Pemberton’s
lawyers claimed that the testimony of forensic pathologist Raquel Fortun
supported the Marine’s claim that Laude was unconscious but still alive when he
left her and that another person could have entered the hotel room and killed
Laude.
But private
prosecution lawyer Virginia Suarez said the defense failed to establish their
assertion and dismissed Fortun’s testimony as incredible because she was paid
to testify based on “theories, photographs and documents” without actually
examining Laude’s body.
“That’s expected.
Fortun admitted the defense paid her services to testify. How can she be
considered credible? The Laude family did not pay the prosecution. She has not
seen or touched her remains,” she said.
“You cannot just compare
a four-page report of Fortun with a comprehensive examination of the forensic
expert from the Philippine National Police who actually dissected and conducted
external and internal autopsy on Laude,” Suarez said.
“I must say we
cannot compare an apple to an orange,” Suarez said, noting that Pemberton only
presented himself, his mother Lisa and Fortun to back his claim that Laude was
still alive when he left her.
“But they could
not establish their assertion [although] that is a good legal tactic for the
defense to convince the court that he had no intention to kill her,” Suarez
said.
“We have
overwhelming pieces of evidence, more than 300 of them with 28 testimonies,”
she added, a day after Pemberton testified that he strangled Laude after a
fight, but the transgender woman was still alive when Pemberton left.
After the defense
rested its case, Judge Roline Ginez-Jabalde of the Olongapo City Regional Trial
Court Branch 74 set closing arguments on September 14 and scheduled December 14
as the deadline of her decision.
Meanwhile, the
Department of Justice is confident that the case against Pemberton was
strengthened after he admitted strangling Laude and that reinforced arguments
against the downgrade of the murder case to homicide.
“Pemberton’s
admission that he strangled Laude certainly helped the prosecution’s case,’’
DOJ Secretary Leila De Lima said, adding that it reinforced the evidence
presented by the DOJ prosecutors in the murder case.
“Our
prosecutorial stance remains the same— target Pemberton’s conviction for
murder, and nothing less,” De Lima assured.
Pemberton
testified on Monday that he was a victim of deception by Laude, whom he
strangled in self-defense in a fit of “passion and obfuscation,” but did not
intend to kill the latter.
The American
serviceman had gotten drunk while on furlough in this city and was supposedly
deceived into believing that Laude was a female sex worker.
During
intercourse, Pemberton said he discovered that Laude was not a woman. Shocked,
Pemberton testified that he pushed back Laude, who slapped him, prompting the
serviceman to choke the transgender.
His lawyer Rowena
Flores explained that Pemberton’s testimony was meant to prove that the
qualifying circumstances of treachery, abuse of superior strength and cruelty
were not present in the case.
The lawyer said
the serviceman “acted in self-defense and to protect his honor and life… and
acted in immediate vindication of the wrong done to him.”
“Jennifer
succeeded in committing such acts of lasciviousness by deceiving Pemberton or
by fraudulent machination,” Flores claimed.
http://manilastandardtoday.com/2015/08/26/pemberton-defense-presents-last-witness/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.