Op/Ed piece in the New Straits Times (Mar 11):
Handling the hype behind Sabah crisis
By Farish A. Noor
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and Philippines President Benigno Aquino witnessing the signing of the peace accord between the Philippines and Moro Islamic Liberation Front in Manila. Splinter groups that have been responsible for the incursion into Sabah happen to be those who felt left out of the peace accord.
CHECK THE INFO: There are many actors in the Sulu saga and there is a need
to separate fact from fiction
THERE are times when I do believe we ought to be more circumspect and
perhaps even cynical when reading the news we get.
As the
Sabah crisis continues at its own
pace, different contenders have come to the fore offering their opinions as to
how the crisis ought to be settled.
Among them has been Nur Misuari, leader of the Moro National Liberation
Front (MNLF), who was once a player in the regional dynamics of
Southern Philippines, but who now seems to be taking the
opportunity to foreground himself once again.
I was somewhat alarmed to read a report in the Borneo Post when Misuari
claimed that "
Sarawak is also part of his
clan's ancestral lands".
I had to read the article several times to convince myself that my failing
eyesight was not deceiving me and that the article was genuine and not a spoof.
Misuari had also suggested that he be given a role as mediator to end the
Sabah incursion, despite his claim that
Sarawak
belongs to his clan.
Then came other reports about how the MNLF was threatening "chaos"
in the region, and that 10,000 Filipinos would be sent to Sabah in a show of
support for the pretender to the Sulu throne there.
Once again, I had to read the reports several times to convince myself that
my eyes were working and that I was not seeing things.
In a state of crisis, one of the first conditions that has to be met is
information management and verification of reports.
While sensational headlines may sell newspapers, they do not calm an already
delicate situation and may, in fact, have the opposite effect of rousing fear
and anger among readers or viewers.
It is for this reason that we ought to remember some salient facts that are pertinent
to the
Sabah situation at the moment.
First, Misuari's MNLF is today a spent force, with around a few hundred
followers left.
If
Manila had chosen to broker a peace accord
with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) instead, it was for the simple
reason that MILF claims to have 15,000 followers and is perhaps the strongest
armed force in
Mindanao at the moment.
They are in fact the only power brokers and if peace is to be restored to
southern
Philippines,
it cannot be done without the support of the MILF.
Second, the other splinter groups that have been largely responsible for the
incursion into Sabah happen to be those who
felt left out of the peace accord and who may have felt that they had been
denied a slice of the pie.
This is indeed unfortunate, but it has more to do with who the government in
Manila
recognises as legitimate actors, and who are not.
No other country in Asean has the right to intervene in this process, but
can only help it along by mediating when asked.
Third, it ought to be clear by
now that the incursion into Sabah was
certainly not the desire of the Philippine government. As President Benigno
Aquino Aquino has noted in his presidential address last week, the constitution
of the Philippines
does not allow for the creation of private armies, the ownership of weapons
without permits, and the unilateral declaration of war on another country by a
citizen who does not represent the state.
On these grounds, the incursion into
Sabah
has no legal standing and was, in fact, contrary to Philippine law itself.
Malaysia cannot
pick itself up and relocate itself in some other quiet corner of the world, and
we should not deny our long historical and diasporic links to all the mobile,
fluid communities that make up the complex social landscape.
Indeed, for centuries, people from Sulu have moved in and out of
Sabah along with Bruneians, Malays, Chinese, Indians,
Arabs, Bajaus, Ilanuns and Bugis.
What is at issue here is how an internal
domestic crisis in the Philippines
has erupted and spilled over into the territory of another country, namely Malaysia. The
Malaysian public in turn may be wary or even angered by a Philippine citizen
who suddenly claims to be their sultan out of nowhere,
but we cannot allow our
judgment to be clouded by fiery rhetoric, disinformation and propaganda that
may be designed to upset us. We need to constantly remind ourselves that this
situation was never the desire of the Philippine government, and we should not
blame the Philippines
as a whole for what has happened.
In the meantime, some of the stories that are emanating from the likes of
Misuari ought to be taken with a heavy dose of salt too: the man who now claims
to wish to mediate the crisis also happens to be the same person who, during
his younger left-leaning days, was inclined to criticise the traditional rulers
of southern Philippines for their feudal culture and elite status. The
solidarity shown for those claiming to be the descendants of the sultan of Sulu
seems hollow and more instrumental, as are the claims that tens of thousands of
southern Filipinos are about to invade Borneo. If these leaders truly wanted
peace in the region, they ought to begin by tempering their own rhetoric for
starters, and stop making claims like
Sarawak
is also part of his clan's ancestral lands.
http://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnist/handling-the-hype-behind-sabah-crisis-1.232411