The BangsamoroTransition Commission (BTC) scheduled the signing ceremony for the draft Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL) on April 20 at the BTC Office in Cotabato City.
Among the guests who are invited to the occasion were Cardinal Orlando Quevedo, Secretary Teresita “Ging” Deles, GPH chief negotiator Miriam Ferrer-Coronel, Bishop Colin Bagaforo, Cotabato City Mayor Japal “Jojo” Guiani Jr., Mayor Ramon Piang of North Upi, Mayor Abdullah Campong of South Upi, selected members of the MILF Central Committee, government and MILF ceasefire committees, and members of the International Monitoring Team (IMT).
Members of the media were also invited to cover the signing ceremony.
Luwaran.com, the official website of the MILF Committee on Information in its editorial on April 16 said that on signing day, all the 15 commissioners are expected to sign the BBL without reservations. As a matter of fact, one lady commissioner, a nominee of the government, requested that every commissioner will be given a copy for posterity’s sake. The BTC agreed but the copy will not be given to the commissioners until at a later date when full disclosure of the BBL will not compromise its smooth deliberation in Congress. Besides, an engagement with the government in this regard is required.
Affixing one’s signature to a historic document is truly historic. It is an episode of a lifetime that only few people are called and given such a rare opportunity. In the same vein, not signing such a historic document is also historic in the reverse, Luwaran also said.
The decision to sign the proposed BBL by every commissioner was a collective will of the BTC during its plenary session last April 13.
There was no dissenting voice, except an earlier one expressed by BTC Chair Mohagher Iqbal for his preference for just affixing the initials of the commissioners in the proposed BBL. But he was alone in such view; no one sees it as the right course of action. Thus, he has to bow down to the will of the majority.
If by chance, any commissioner decides not to affix his/her signature to the proposed BBL, such is within the purview of his or her right. No one can question that. But one thing sure is that he or she has to explain why he or she did not sign. History will judge his or her decision. But in the immediate, the negative decision will surely make the spoilers happy; they will feast on this even if the decision was based on reasons personally well-thought-out, the Luwaran also said.
It can be recalled that on April 14, the BTC submitted a partial but formally adopted portion of the BBL to the Office of the President. It was in line with the instruction of the president to the BTC to submit the draft when they made a courtesy call on him last January 30.
A complete BBL draft bearing the signatures of the commissioners will be submitted after the Holy week.
Better this early, every BTC commissioner must examine his or her conscience whether what side to vote: positively or negatively --- and it is the right thing.
http://www.luwaran.com/index.php/welcome/item/934-btc-sets-ceremonial-signing-of-bbl
Members of the media were also invited to cover the signing ceremony.
Luwaran.com, the official website of the MILF Committee on Information in its editorial on April 16 said that on signing day, all the 15 commissioners are expected to sign the BBL without reservations. As a matter of fact, one lady commissioner, a nominee of the government, requested that every commissioner will be given a copy for posterity’s sake. The BTC agreed but the copy will not be given to the commissioners until at a later date when full disclosure of the BBL will not compromise its smooth deliberation in Congress. Besides, an engagement with the government in this regard is required.
Affixing one’s signature to a historic document is truly historic. It is an episode of a lifetime that only few people are called and given such a rare opportunity. In the same vein, not signing such a historic document is also historic in the reverse, Luwaran also said.
The decision to sign the proposed BBL by every commissioner was a collective will of the BTC during its plenary session last April 13.
There was no dissenting voice, except an earlier one expressed by BTC Chair Mohagher Iqbal for his preference for just affixing the initials of the commissioners in the proposed BBL. But he was alone in such view; no one sees it as the right course of action. Thus, he has to bow down to the will of the majority.
If by chance, any commissioner decides not to affix his/her signature to the proposed BBL, such is within the purview of his or her right. No one can question that. But one thing sure is that he or she has to explain why he or she did not sign. History will judge his or her decision. But in the immediate, the negative decision will surely make the spoilers happy; they will feast on this even if the decision was based on reasons personally well-thought-out, the Luwaran also said.
It can be recalled that on April 14, the BTC submitted a partial but formally adopted portion of the BBL to the Office of the President. It was in line with the instruction of the president to the BTC to submit the draft when they made a courtesy call on him last January 30.
A complete BBL draft bearing the signatures of the commissioners will be submitted after the Holy week.
Better this early, every BTC commissioner must examine his or her conscience whether what side to vote: positively or negatively --- and it is the right thing.
http://www.luwaran.com/index.php/welcome/item/934-btc-sets-ceremonial-signing-of-bbl
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.