The Chinese
Foreign Ministry flatly denied a report that China
offered the Philippines
incentives to stop it from filing its memorial, or written pleading, in its
historic case over the West Philippine Sea (South China
Sea ).
In a media
briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang denounced reports on
these incentives as “sheer fabrication.”
“No one can shake
the Chinese government's resolve of safeguarding national territorial
sovereignty and maritime rights and interests. We will never trade away our
sovereignty and territory,” Qin said Friday, February 28.
He made this
statement after Rappler on Wednesday, February 26, reported that China proposed the mutual withdrawal of ships
from the disputed Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal in exchange for the Philippines not
submitting its memorial by March 30.
Roilo Golez, a
former national security adviser, said a back channel in the territorial
dispute tipped him off on the proposed “carrot” from China . Two insiders in government
also confirmed this to Rappler.
The Chinese
Embassy in the Philippines
earlier had “no information to offer” about this.
On Friday, Qin
explained: “With reference to the Philippines '
attempt of initiating arbitration proceeding against China
regarding South China Sea dispute, China is firmly opposed to and will
by no means accept that. This clear-cut position will not change.”
'Reject China 's
incentives'
On Monday, March 3,
party-list group Akbayan carried placards that said, “Reject China's
incentives,” in a protest in front of the Chinese consulate in Makati City .
The group slammed
China
for the water cannon incident that triggered a recent protest from the Philippine government.
“The Filipino
people will not fall for this crude ‘good cop, bad cop’ antic being employed by
China ,”
Akbayan Rep Walden Bello said in a statement.
Philippine
senators, for their part, cautioned the government about China 's offer.
“Will it move us
forward? Is it mutually beneficial to China ,
the Philippines ,
and other claimant countries? If we are to avoid a confrontation, we must come
up with a win-win situation. Our foreign policy must be clear. It’s not about
withdrawing ships. This is not Divisoria. This is not haggling or bartering.
Our long-term national interest must be clear,” Sen Gregorio Honasan II said.
The Philippine
government hopes to win the case by 2015.
Solicitor General
Francis Jardeleza said it's a “doubly difficult” task for the Philippines , especially because China has
rejected the arbitral proceedings.
To help
PH 'save face'
“No. Don't take
that carrot," reader Alexis Lao said in Rappler's comments section.
Lao recalled that
China did the same thing to
the Philippines
during the term of former president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. During her
administration, Arroyo entered into deal with China
to jointly explore the South China Sea, a move seen as giving up the Philippines '
rights over its marine resources.
Because of this,
Lao said the Philippines
“should first establish” the West Philippine Sea
“as rightfully ours.” Only then can the Philippines
“invite China
to invest in the exploration since they have the money.”
For Arturo Sarga,
another reader, a mutual withdrawal of ships from Panatag “seems fine if only
to ease the tension and avoid accidental firings that can lead to a shooting
war.” He said China 's offer
“is a safe saving face for both China
and the Philippines .”
“Going to the
international court? We will only deplete public funds for hiring... lawyers
for [an] indefinite time,” he said.
Joseph Zamora
questioned the mere idea that the Cabinet discussed this. “There's nothing to
think about,” he said. “Why do we have to consider their offer?”
http://www.rappler.com/nation/52005-china-denies-incentives-philippines-dispute
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.