Tuesday, June 21, 2016

‘IT WILL BE A MASSACRE’ PHL won't go to war with China over Scarborough Shoal —Duterte

From GMA News (Jun 21): ‘IT WILL BE A MASSACRE’ PHL won't go to war with China over Scarborough Shoal —Duterte

The Philippines will not go to war over the Scarborough Shoal even if it wins the arbitration case it filed against China's excessive claims in the disputed South China Sea, President-elect Rodrigo Duterte told business leaders on Tuesday.

In his first speaking engagement in weeks, Duterte even expressed an apparent disagreement with the Philippines joining US' patrols in the disputed waters supposedly to press freedom of navigation in the area.

"Kung nandiyan na 'yung aircraft carrier sa South China Sea na 'yan, patrolling, and the Americans would say, 'Come join us in our expedition,' ah, sorry," Duterte said while waving his hand.

"I will not go to war because of the Scarborough Shoal lang," he added.

Duterte said that if the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled in favor of the Philippines and its 200-kilometer Exclusive Economic Zone under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, he'd only send civilian coast guard vessels.

He said he already told US Ambassador Philip Goldberg of this plan when they met in Davao City recently.

"Sabi niya, 'What do you intend to do?' If there's the arbitral judgment, I will go there, coast guard lang.  Hindi pang giyera 'yan. You guard the coast, that's coast guard," Duterte said.

"Kung magpadala ako ang navy diyan, a kalokohan 'yan.... We are not in a position. That's a massacre," he added.

‘Not a territorial issue’

Duterte said the Scarborough Shoal wasn't a territorial issue.

"It is an issue of our exclusivity sa economic zone. That you place there obstructions that will impede or obstruct our right to develop and fish anywhere there, 'yun ang contention," Duterte said.

"That is our ache but that is not a thing to just say we will go to war," he added.

Duterte said that the Philippines would be better off solving the insurgency  that has kept development from happening particularly in Mindanao.

"We are better off solving the internal problem first.... Then we can open up tourism and investment," Duterte said.

"Maraming isda diyan sa Tawi-tawi. They are dying of boredom.  Naghihintay lang sila," he added.

300 MIGs

Duterte said the money the Aquino administration used to buy 12 FA-50 fighter jets could have been used instead to buy helicopters with night vision capability.

"Sayang ang pera doon. You can't use it for anti-insugency which is the problem of the moment. You can only use it only for ceremonial fly-bys," Duterte said.

Duterte said choppers with night vision could have been used to run after Abu Sayyaf Group bandits who kidnapped foreigners and a Filipino woman recently in Davao del Norte.

He indicated that the Philippines could not match China's air force.

"[Beyond] that Scarborough Shoal, anak ng jueteng, according to the intelligence, there are 300 MIGs (fighter jets) there, which can reach Manila in six minutes," Duterte said.

"Why would I go to war? Ang battle ground mo Palawan? Loko-loko ka pala eh. If you want to do battle sa San Francisco, okay lang," he added.

‘Are you with us?’

Duterte said he asked Goldberg if the superpower US would indeed side with the Philippines if an armed conflict erupted in the region.

"Are you with us or are you not with us?" Duterte said.

"Sabi niya, 'Only if you are attacked'," he added.

"The law of the sea gives us exclusive rights sa 200 kilometers. If I go there, will that be an attack against China...? Mabuti na iyang prangkahan," Duterte said.

http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/570818/news/nation/phl-won-t-go-to-war-with-china-over-scarborough-shoal-duterte

1 comment:

  1. Wow! Why would you admit publicly that the Philippines will not go to war over the Scarborough Shoal? Isn't that like giving a green light to the Chinese to do what they want?

    Then he asks Amb. Goldberg "Are you with us or are you not with us?" If I was Goldberg I would have said apparently we're not with you over Scarborough. If you're not willing to defend Scarborough why should we put our military forces at risk??

    Personally, I tend to side with analysts/observers who believe that the US should draw a red line at Scarborough and send a clear message to the Chinese that any attempt to build an artificial island or any other structure there would provoke a US military response.

    If the Chinese do carryout a reclamation project there, and the US fails to respond, it would be a loss of face for the US for all the world to see. It potentially could undermine our mutual defense treaties in Asia and force other countries in the region to reach an accommodation with China.

    It would appear that China's long tern goal is to become the regional hegemon, the new Imperial China. To do that they have to expel US military power from the region. First from the East and South China Seas by undermining US defense treaties in the region and intimidating US allies.

    Over the long haul, the Chinese will seek to make the US military presence in Asia untenable, eventually forcing the US military out of the region altogether.

    Given Chinese actions in the East and South China Seas, those who continue to assert that China's rise will be peaceful and benign better check what they're smoking because they are suffering from some serious delusions.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.