Senior Philippine foreign affairs and defense officials and
their counterparts from the United States
have reiterated that the maritime dispute in the South
China Sea must be resolved through international arbitration.
Communication Secretary Herminio Coloma, Jr. said during a
press briefing in MalacaƱang on Thursday that the officials of the two
countries made the statement following their fifth Bilateral Strategic Dialogue
held in Manila
on January 20 to 21.
“The two countries expressed concern over developments in
the South China Sea that are inconsistent with the 2002 ASEAN-China Declaration
on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) and international law,
and emphasized the importance of upholding peace and stability, respect for international
law, unimpeded lawful commerce, and freedom of navigation and over flight,”
Coloma said, reading the joint statement.
“The two sides reiterated that international disputes in the
South China Sea should be settled in
accordance with international law, and through diplomatic and other peaceful
means, including the use of international arbitration,” he added.
On March 30 last year, the Philippines
filed a memorial before the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea
(ITLOS) against China .
Philippine officials on Wednesday accused China of
expanding its reclamation work in the disputed territory, describing it as
“massive.”
Present during the dialogue were Foreign Affairs
Undersecretary Evan P. Garcia and National Defense Undersecretary Pio Lorenzo
F. Batino for the Philippines ,
and Assistant Secretary of State Daniel Russel and Assistant Secretary of
Defense David Shear for the US .
Meanwhile, asked if the dialogue discussed the status of the
Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), which is pending at the Supreme
Court, Coloma said both sides have acknowledged that there are legal questions
that are now being addressed at the Supreme Court.
Former senators Wigberto TaƱada and Rene Saguisag filed a
petition at the Supreme Court in May last year, questioning the validity of the
EDCA.
The petitioners argued that the agreement is
unconstitutional and violates several provisions of the 1987 Constitution.
The EDCA was signed in April last year, shortly before US
President Barrack Obama arrived in Manila
for a visit.
http://www.pna.gov.ph/index.php?idn=1&sid=&nid=1&rid=728169
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.