Aside from crafting a diplomatic strategy, the Philippines under a new leadership must also
capacitate its defense sector in the midst of territorial disputes vis-à-vis China ,
according to a Philippine expert.
Aileen Baviera, a professor of Asian Studies at the
University of the Philippines (UP), discussed in a public lecture her study
titled “Domestic Stakeholders in Philippine Maritime Disputes: Impact and
Influence on Foreign Policy”.
Baviera said that defense and diplomacy should be
complementary to strategically address the security challenge posed by the
maritime disputes.
“If you don’t strengthen your defense, then it weakens your
diplomacy. Weak defense capability means weak diplomacy,” she said.
The UP professor, however, emphasized that improving the
capability of defense and law enforcement agencies does not necessarily equate
to waging war, rather it is a form of deterrence and preparation for
contingencies.
Baviera noted that the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP)
is transitioning from internal security operations to territorial defense.
”The demands of territorial defense are new to us, something
we have to learn. We have to capacitate ourselves. It is going to be an uphill
battle,” she said, adding that it will definitely not be an overtime
adjustment.
She said the Philippine domestic front liners in the
maritime disputes are the defense, security, and law enforcement sector. They
are currently faced with a changing security landscape.
With China
training sophisticated fishermen militia who fall along the lines of civilian
and military, the nature of the disputes reaches a whole new level. The
existence of “grey zones”, she said, blurs the rules of engagement. Thus, the
question on who to mobilize arises.
Furthermore, Baviera pointed that the “maritime governance
bureaucracy is still immature” with a lack of higher guidance on policy and
strategy, as well as poor crisis management.
A “one-approach” diplomacy does not offer a political
solution to these issues, she said.
Baviera said the maritime disputes largely affect our
Philippine foreign policy—crystallizing our national interests, and animating
our diplomacy with big powers such as the ASEAN, East Asia
and United Nations.
”Our policies and positions are expressions of our values
and identity perceived by others,” she said.
“We need strong and wise leadership with strategic foresight
to see how this will all come together,” she added.
President-elect Rodrigo Duterte earlier said that he will
consider holding direct talks with China if the multilateral approach
remains stalled.
Manila-Beijing ties have been somewhat muddled due to
maritime disputes with a pending arbitration case the Philippines brought to the United Nations
Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague , Netherlands in 2013 against China ’s territorial claims in the South China Sea . The ruling is expected soon.
Baviera specializes on and writes about contemporary China studies, China -Southeast Asia relations, Asia-Pacific security,
territorial and maritime disputes, and regional integration. Her other notable
academic publication is titled “The Domestic Mediations of China’s Influence in
the Philippines ,”
which will appear in Rising China’s Influence in Developing Asia.
http://www.pna.gov.ph/index.php?idn=1&sid=&nid=1&rid=893526
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.