Monday, January 12, 2015

Laude family asks Olongapo RTC to reconsider plea for Pemberton’s transfer to regular jail

From the Philippine News Agency (Jan 12): Laude family asks Olongapo RTC to reconsider plea for Pemberton’s transfer to regular jail

The family of slain Filipino transgender Jeffrey "Jennifer" Laude has asked the Olongapo City Regional Trial Court (RTC) to reconsider its Dec. 23, 2014 ruling dismissing their bid for the transfer of accused United States Marine Lance Cpl. Joseph Scott Pemberton to a regular jail.

In their motion for reconsideration (MR), Marilou S. Laude, sister of the victim, also asked the Olongapo RTC to allow media coverage of the trial.

Laude, through her lawyer Harry Roque, said that the “rationale” behind the “three-day notice rule” was not violated in this case because the Pemberton camp had the opportunity to be given their side on their motion.

Roque said that Atty. Felimon Ray Javier, collaborating counsel for Pemberton, as well as Olongapo City Chief Prosecutor Emilie Fe Delos Santos were both present during the hearing of the motions and even made their comments.

Under the Rules of Court, the three-day notice rule requires every written motion required to be heard to be served upon the adverse party at least three days before the date of hearing.

Such rule imposes upon the movant the burden of making sure that the other party actually receives his motion at least three days before the hearing so that the adverse party may have ample time to prepare.

Roque added that the rule is not “absolute”.

He said that non-observance of the rule is allowed as long as the rights of the other party were not prejudiced.

He cited Marilou's “right to access to justice” under international human rights law which exempts her from the requirement that a public prosecutor must conforme to the motion that she will file in court.

"Under international human rights law, the private complainant and her family members have the right to access to justice, a right that is separate and distinct from the power of the Public Prosecutors to prosecute the criminal case," he said.

He added that the issues raised in their motions "are issues of transcendental importance and of primordial public interest. Hence, it is essential that the honorable court resolve the two motions on its substantive merits."

In their MR filed last December, they asked the Olongapo City RTC to order the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) to transfer the detention of Pemberton to the Olongapo City Jail.

In the said MR, Roque reiterated their position that Pemberton should be with Philippine authorities citing Article V, Paragraph 3 (b) of the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) which states that “within the scope of their legal competence, the authorities of the Philippines and the US shall assist each other in the arrest of US personnel in the Philippines and in handing them over to authorities who are to exercise jurisdiction in accordance with the provisions of this article.”

They also cited the DOJ Opinion No.94 issued by then Justice Secretary Serafin Cuevas which stated that in cases of particular importance and extraordinary cases, the Philippine government may refuse a US request for custody.

On their bid to allow media coverage, Roque said that they have the right under international human rights law to know and be informed about the proceedings through the media, including what is happening inside the courtroom.

They cited the fact that Laude’s mother, Julita, and other members of the family reside in a far-flung area in Leyte making her unable to attend to all the proceedings in the case, aside from financial constraints, making her and the rest of the family dependent on the media for news on the case.

They also said that barring the media from the courtroom during the proceedings is tantamount to violation of the right to free speech and of the press.

“Barring the press from the courtroom might partake of a serious limitation on the rights to free speech and of the press. The so-called fourth estate has the constitutionally guaranteed protection to report on matters of great public interest, including criminal proceedings in this case,” their seven-page MR said.

http://www.pna.gov.ph/index.php?idn=1&sid=&nid=1&rid=724250

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.