File photo of US Marines during the Balikatan joint military exercises
So long as the Philippine government allows it and retains “absolute control,” foreign forces can be directly involved in any local military or law enforcement operation, Justice Leila de Lima said Wednesday.
In the case of Oplan Exodus, the disastrous Special Action
Force mission to get Malaysian terrorist Zulkifli bin Hir, alias “Marwan,” in
his lair in Mamasapano, Maguindanao, De Lima said the questions that should be
asked about American involvement should not be about “the extent or type of US
participation” but “the degree of control the Philippine government exercised
over the operation.”
Stressing that what she was presenting was an “academic
discussion” on how much participation American or foreign troops can be allowed
in the country, De Lima said: “The bottom line is the ability of the Philippine
government to determine for itself the extent of US involvement and the full
exercise of its control in making decisions on the what, who, when and how of a
particular operation.”
Earlier in the hearing, sacked SAF commander Getulio Napenas
confirmed that at least two Americans were at his tactical command post
providing “real-time information” on the situation in the area of operations,
specifically that of the 84th SAF Seaborne, the unit tasked to get Marwan, with
four others outside, and that more US personnel arrived on January 26 to help
evacuate casualties.
Napenas also confirmed that Americans provided training
before Exodus and also gave similar assistance on at least two previous
operations, both failures, but that no US personnel were involved in
actual combat.
While Marwan is now confirmed to have been killed, the
ensuing clash also claimed the lives of 44 SAF commandos, 17 Moro Islamic
Liberation Front fighters and at least three civilians, leaving the Mindanao peace process in the balance and President
Benigno Aquino III facing the worst political crisis of his term.
De Lima stressed that foreign affairs is the “competency of
the executive branch,” which is why it can “enter into agreements not needing
the concurrence of the Senate” to enhance the country’s security, “especially
against terrorist threats,” apparently referring to the Visiting Forces
Agreement with the US .
Constitutional and legal limits
She said there are only three constitutional and legal
limits to the extent of foreign military activity in the country: the
prohibition against permanent military bases, freedom from nuclear weapons, and
“the general principle of an independent foreign policy and non-intervention”
in sovereign affairs.
In fact, she said, a 2002 Supreme Court decision “provides
only broad limitations” on allowable activities for joint military cooperation,
and that the “VFA contains no limitations on what activities will be covered.”
While acknowledging that “some quarters will draw the line
on the involvement of foreign personnel in actual combat,” with which she said
agreed, De Lima nevertheless pointed out that, "this is the least of our
concerns” because the VFA also allowed this if “absolutely necessary for self-defense
in in defense of their troops.”
“But granting that there were American boots on the ground,”
she added, stressing that “this is tsismis (rumors),” does this ipso
facto mean the Constitution has been violated?”
“What determines the limit of US participation in military or law
enforcement operations is not the type of operation, or advice … but the degree
of control or decision-making the Philippine government exercises,” De Lima
stressed.
Thus, “as laid down in the VFA,” American involvement in
Oplan Exodus “presents no violation of independence.”
http://www.interaksyon.com/article/108423/academic-discussion--us-can-engage-in-combat-as-long-as-ph-has-absolute-control---de-lima
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.