THE HAGUE, Netherlands - An international tribunal will hand down a ruling on Tuesday in an increasingly bitter dispute over the South China Sea, in a closely-watched case that risks ratcheting up tensions in Southeast Asia.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) -- the world's
oldest international arbitration tribunal -- will issue a written decision at
11:00 a.m. (0900 GMT) after the Philippines
challenged China 's
claim over much of the strategic waterway.
Angered by the move, Beijing
refused to participate, adding it would not comply with the ruling by a
tribunal with "no jurisdiction" over the issue.
Legal experts agree that after three years of deliberations,
two hearings, and nearly 4,000 pages of evidence, the court in The
Hague is likely to find in Manila 's
favor -- in a decision with far-reaching ramifications.
"An award from the tribunal that rejects some of
China's more dubious claims would provide support for the mainstream views of
other states in the region," Cecily Rose, assistant law professor of
Public International Law at Leiden University, told AFP.
"China
is bound to comply with the award.
"But should it refuse to do so, the tribunal has no
enforcement mechanism to which it can turn," Rose said.
Military tensions
The judgment comes against the backdrop of frequent military
brushes between China and
its Asian neighbors the Philippines ,
Vietnam , Malaysia , Brunei ,
and Taiwan ,
which ring the waters believed to hold untapped oil and gas reserves.
The tensions have also alarmed the United States which has key defence treaties
with many regional allies, and in a show of strength last week sent warships to
patrol close to some of the reefs and islands claimed by China .
"Whatever the outcome, the case will not contribute to
improved relations between China
and other claimants in the South China Sea ,"
Frans-Paul van der Putten, a senior researcher at the Clingendael think-tank,
told AFP.
Newly-elected Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte said he
was optimistic of a favorable ruling, but offered to hold conciliatory talks
with China .
And he vowed he would not "taunt or flaunt" any favorable ruling.
Philippine Foreign Secretary Perfecto Yasay, also in a
softening of Manila 's stance, said Friday the
country was willing to share natural resources with China .
But China 's
state-run media said Friday Beijing will not take "a single step
back" in the waterway.
The Asian economic and military powerhouse claims most of
the South China Sea, even waters approaching neighboring countries, as its
sovereign territory, basing its arguments on Chinese maps dating back to the
1940s marked with a so-called "nine-dash line."
Expert Joris Larik from The Hague Institute for Global
Justice think-tank pointed out that Manila is aiming to "pierce" the
nine-dash line, adding: "China's position and credibility will be weakened
if the arbitral panel finds against it."
But Chinese President Xi Jinping said Beijing
was "not afraid of trouble" and state-run media urged China to
prepare for "military confrontation" in the waters.
No 'historic' claim
Manila stresses it is not asking the court to resolve
sovereignty or delimit boundaries, but is seeking decisions on some key points.
Referring to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Manila contends the "nine-dash" line has no
basis under international law and Beijing
has no "historic" claim to the waters.
The Philippine government also says some of the
"islands" claimed by Beijing
are merely rocks, and not entitled to a "territorial sea" or an
exclusive economic zone.
Tensions between China
and its neighbors in the sea have at times flared into open conflict including
in 1988 when Vietnam and China fought a naval battle on Johnson Reef in
the Spratly Islands which killed about 70
Vietnamese.
The sea's shipping lanes connect East Asia with Europe and
the Middle East , and over $5 trillion (4.5
trillion euros) in ship-borne trade passes through them annually.
http://interaksyon.com/article/130168/hague-tribunal-to-rule-in-tense-south-china-sea-row-on-tuesday
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.