IS isn't just
targeting the Middle East and the US . It's aiming at Southeast Asia , too. Malaysian authorities recently
stopped a major IS-influenced attack, and Indonesian and Philippine officials
are scrambling to prevent their own growing flocks of IS-inspired terrorists
from going on the rampage. IS is a global threat.
ThePhilippines ' Foreign
Ministry says that 200 of its citizens have gone to war under IS's flag in the Middle East . Most of these are orphans of dead fighters
from domestic Islamist insurgent groups such as the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) and
Moro National Liberation Front.
The
Retired General Rodolfo Mendoza, head of
the Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research, says, "They
answer to no one and consider themselves one with the Islamic caliphate."
The ASG and the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Fighters (BIFF) announced their allegiance with IS in
August.
Other Philippine groups such as the Khilafah Islamiyah Movement (KIM),
responsible for shopping center and hotel bombings, are inspired by IS and crave a caliphate.
On
August 9th, Indonesia 's
police counter terror unit, Detachment 88, arrested JAT official Afif Abdul Majid
and two others for joining IS. Majid has helped carry out scores of operations
in Indonesia ,
including suicide bombings against a church and a
mosque in 2011.
"We have found the [IS] flag on every terrorist
arrested this year," Indonesian Police spokesman Boy Rafli Amar recently said.
At
least 56 Indonesians have joined the IS fight in the Middle East . Malaysian Special Branch (SB) arrested 19 IS-inspired suspects
between April and June.
Their mission was to attack civilian targets and
overthrow Putrajaya, the "Washington DC of Malaysia ,"
and replace it with a caliphate. Ayub
Khan, head of SB's Counter Terror Division, says the targets included
"...a disco, pubs in Kuala Lumpur
and a Carlsberg [beer] factory."
The
accused included everyday professionals and two housewives.
They had raised thousands of dollars for their plot and purchased aluminum
powder, a common ingredient of homemade bombs.
Mr. Khan said, "In terms of
ideology and intention, it was very clear. It would have been carried out."
Malaysia
says at least 20 of its citizens -- and probably more -- have joined IS in the
Middle East, and at least three have been killed. One was a suicide bomber who died in Iraq in May.
What's
it all mean? First,
IS's growing influence across Southeast Asia
indicates trouble for the region. Malaysia will remain under threat, and
IS-inspired fighters will worsen the low intensity conflicts in Indonesia and the Philippines . By default, this puts
ever-vigilant Singapore
at risk, which is always in the crosshairs of Islamist jihadists. IS might also
inspire Thailand 's
otherwise local Islamist-Pattani nationalist insurgency that has increased
violence in the face of failing negotiations with the government. According to
the rebel manual, Fight for the Liberation of Pattani, they want a local
caliphate, too. Burma 's
small Muslim vs. Buddhist conflict has already spilled over into Indonesia and Malaysia with a few bombings and
assassinations. It's a candidate for IS provocation as well.
Second, IS's actions in Malaysia prove that it's not
necessarily about concrete terror networks. Senate Majority
Leader Harry
Reid said recently IS couldn't attack the US
at the moment, saying, "ISIS, they have no tentacles here yet."
He's wrong.
IS is primarily about inspiring individuals -- even housewives --
through its victories and successful Islamist jihadi "brand" that set
up a large caliphate. Terrorist networking -- intelligence, planning, and
logistics -- simply follows after these radicals coagulate.
Third, IS's activities in Southeast Asia indicate
what it might do in America .
Congressman Mike
Rogers, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, says hundreds of
Americans are fighting for IS in the Middle East, in part funneled there by a
long standing "twin city" terror pipeline in Minneapolis-Saint Paul.
The motivation of Islamist jihadists to attack America
is here, IS has capitalized on it, and there are people to carry out these
threats, just like Southeast Asia .
Ultimately,
not countering IS "out there" before they "get here" has
been a colossal strategic miscalculation by the Obama
administration. "It is a threat to the United States ," says Secretary
of Defense Hagel. "...A clear threat to our partners in that area, and it is imminent."
President
Obama decisively defining the threat and what to do about is what America needs.
Instead, it was British PM David Cameron who, on August 29th, gave a rousing,
leadership-drenched speech declaring that it was IS's Islamist jihadi ideology
that was the main threat to the UK .
He then listed decisive steps to thwart it.
In stark contrast, President Obama,
even in his September 10th speech announcing strikes against IS in Iraq , continued
to dance around this subject, pretending Islamist jihadi ideology is not
an issue. It is a continuation of the Ostrich doctrine, which serves to
protect no one.
[Jeff Moore, Ph.D., is the chief executive officer of
Muir Analytics, which assesses threats from insurgent and terror groups against
corporations. He is the author of the recently published book, The Thai Way of
Counterinsurgency.]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.