'You can't solve a problem if you don't recognize that there is one,' the Philippines says after China rejected its South China Sea plan
“What tension? What problem?”
Philippine
Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario criticized China
on Monday, August 11, for supposedly keeping this mindset about the South China Sea .
For Del Rosario , China 's
refusal to "recognize" the problems in the contested sea makes it
difficult for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to resolve the
South China Sea disputes.
Del Rosario made
the statement after China
rejected the Philippines '
proposal to freeze provocative activities in the disputed waters. (READ: PH hits China over sea plan:
'We're humoring ourselves')
The moratorium
falls under the Triple Action Plan (TAP), which the Philippines recently proposed to the ASEAN.
The TAP aims to curb “specific”
activities that raise tensions in the South
China Sea . It also seeks to serve as a “more concrete definition”
of Paragraph 5 the ASEAN-China Declaration of the Conduct (DOC) of Parties in
the South China Sea , a 2002 statement to
maintain peace in the disputed waters.
Paragraph 5 of
the DOC, a non-binding document, says claimant states should “undertake to
exercise self-restraint in the conduct of activities that would complicate or
escalate disputes and affect peace and stability.”
“I think if ASEAN
can make the point to China
strongly that we should have a serious, effective implementation of the DOC,
especially Article 5, as a starter, then I think we're in business,” Del
Rosario said.
“But that would
assume that China
recognizes there's a problem,” he added. “As I said, they established that,
'What tension? What problem?' You can't solve a problem if you don't recognize
that there is one.”
Del Rosario
pointed out that the ASEAN was “very supportive” of the TAP and, in a rare
move, posed no objections to the initiative. “Everyone agreed that there was a
problem.”
The ASEAN
ministers, however, did not explicitly support the TAP in their joint
communiqué after their meeting. Despite this, the Philippines said the ministers
adopted “parts” of the TAP as “doable.”
Del Rosario said China , for its
part, opposed the TAP “immediately, as soon as I came out with it.”
“If something
comes to you then you oppose it, it means you're prejudiced. We don't want them
to take a prejudiced view of this. We want them to take an objective,
constructive viewpoint,” the Philippines '
top diplomat said.
Criticizing China , Del
Rosario also said rejecting the TAP is like disregarding the DOC.
Del Rosario
explained: “The TAP, if you take a look at it, is DOC-centered. And the message
that I wanted to deliver is, TAP is good because it's DOC. If you don't accept
TAP, then you don't believe in DOC. So let's stop talking about DOC, right?
We're just humoring ourselves, 'di ba (right)?”
Wang questioned
the Philippines ' historic
case against China
even as legal moves fall under the TAP's “final approach.”
Wang said: “If
the Philippines
wish to pursue its 3-step plan, it should withdraw its push for international
arbitration and return to the first step....They've already skipped straight to
the third step. Their behavior already contradicts their own proposals.”
Wang was
apparently referring to the moratorium on provocative actions as the first
step, and arbitration as the third step.
Department of
Foreign Affairs spokesman Charles Jose clarified that the TAP shouldn't be
understood in terms of “steps,” but as approaches that can be pursued
simultaneously. (READ: Philippines denies violating own
South China Sea plan)
Despite China 's refusal to heed it, the Philippines said the TAP can help even China itself.
http://www.rappler.com/nation/66006-philippines-china-problem-south-china-sea
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.