The agreement will be signed in time for the arrival of US President Barack Obama in Manila
The
This comes as US President Barack Obama
is set to arrive in Manila
Monday, for the final leg of his Asian tour.
Details of the
agreement, called the Enhanced Defense Cooperation,
have yet to be released. It will be signed at 10 am in Camp Aguinaldo .
Evan Medeiros,
senior director for Asian Affairs on the National Security Council, said the
deal was a "skeletal and muscular" framework that would allow the two
sides to discuss rotations of US troops, naval visits and training exercises.
He said the deal
was "the most significant agreement that we have concluded with the Philippines in
decades."
The "scope,
duration and location" of US forces in Philippines remained to be worked
out "in the coming weeks and years," Medeiros said.
But US officials
said the agreement would last for 10 years, with provision for renewal. They
said it would be signed by Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin and US ambassador
to Manila Philip Goldberg.
Against the
backdrop of ongoing tensions between the Philippines and China over
disputed territories in the West Philippine Sea (South China Sea),
the Philippines has sought the military assistance of US, a treaty ally. (READ:Obama visit to give 'clearer
understanding' of PH-US alliance)
'Not
because of China '
Medeiros,
however, dismissed the notion that Washington
saw the agreement through a prism of containing China 's rising military might.
"We are not
doing this because of China .
We are doing this because we have a longstanding alliance partner. They are
interested in stepping up our military-to-military" interaction, he said.
Defense would be on top of the
agenda during Obama's visit, Malacañang earlier said.
While details of
the pact have yet to be released, the Philippine panel earlier said it would
allow more US troops,
aircraft, and ships to pass through the Philippines .
It would also
allow the United States
to store equipment that could be used to mobilize American forces faster –
particularly in cases of natural disasters.
Different
sides
Former lawmakers
who voted to remove US bases in the Philippines in 1991 have criticized
the lack of transparency
in the negotiatons.
Other critics
have slammed the military deal as a “de facto basing agreement
disguised as an access pact” but Philippine negotiators have
stressed it would not allow the US
to establish a permanent base or bring in nuclear weapons.
Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago
earlier questioned the constitutionality of the agreement, saying it should
have been approved by the Senate.
But Malacañang
insisted the agreement was temporary and only implemented the general
provisions of the Mutual Defense Treaty and the Visiting Forces Agreement, and
therefore did not need Senate concurrence.
http://www.rappler.com/nation/56527-us-ph-reach-military-deal
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.