The country’s maritime sovereignty and security have been compromised many times over due to decades of neglect and indifference by past political leadership, according to a military paper.
A 40-page
military study, a copy of which was obtained by The STAR, noted that because of
this neglect, the country’s external and territorial security have been in a
woeful and pathetic state, especially in terms of maritime capability.
“There are now
multitude of issues and challenges facing this archipelagic country. These
include high rates of human trafficking, weapons smuggling, Chinese
assertiveness in the West Philippine Sea (WPS), to name a few,” the paper said.
It stressed that
the Philippines is a coastal
or archipelagic nation and the world’s second largest archipelago, next only to
Indonesia .
It has the fifth longest coastline totaling 36,289 kilometers.
On top of this,
the country is strategically positioned in East Asia
where the world’s most important navigational sea lanes crisscross one another.
The nation also
sits astride major shipping routes between the Americas
and Southern China and Southeast Asia, as well as between northern Australia and the Lombok
Straits and Northeast
Asia .
Unfortunately,
the country lacks maritime security and infrastructure and has failed to check
and secure around 70,000 international vessels traversing year-round the Luzon Straits
and Malacca Straits
and the waterways in the Sulu Sea , the paper
said.
Aside from the 55
percent of Indian trade to East Asia, 95 percent of Japanese oil requirements
form the Middle East and 90 percent of the
world’s trade (by volume) pass the country’s waters every year.
“Against this
backdrop, it is surprising that the Philippines has the most
inward-looking and myopic outlook in the region in relation to its maritime
environment.
“Internally and
externally, the nation is fraught with serious maritime issues but government
priorities are clearly misplaced,” the paper said.
In spite of its
enormous natural wealth, there exists a misunderstood “culture of poverty.”
This lamentable
situation of Philippine maritime security can easily be traced to the attitude
of its past leaders and policy-makers in their understanding and appreciation
of geography.
“The leaders are
focused on their respective areas, which means that although they may embark on
improving their respective ports, hardly any would think of the
inter-connectivity of their areas, much less think of the entire nation in a
maritime context,” the paper said.
“This attitude
keeps legislators entrusted with the ‘power of the purse’ from looking at the
national perspective and coming to grips with the reality,” it said.
The military
study also noted that the development of maritime capability stagnated because
of the security umbrella that the United States provided to the
country through the years, the land-based campaign against the insurgents and
budgetary constraints, the paper added.
“For this reason,
the need to set the power of the Philippine Navy and the Air Force against the
size of their commitments was gravely overlooked. The development of their
capabilities was to come only in the mid-1990s after the pull-out of US bases
and the assertiveness of China
in the contested West Philippine Sea ,” the
study said.
The paper also
warned while the war of today has been deregulated by international law, the
prospect of states going to war for various interests, including sovereignty
and national self-defense, is ever present.
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/06/14/15/maritime-sovereignty-compromised-due-govt-neglect-military-paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.