From the Philippine Daily Inquirer (Dec 24): AFP: What order of battle?
The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) on Sunday flatly denied allegations
that it was maintaining an order of battle (OB) or a hit list of personalities
considered as enemies of the state. “In the Armed Forces, we do not practice keeping a hit list or even an order
of battle,” AFP spokesperson Col. Arnulfo Burgos Jr. said in an interview over
radio DzBB. “What we have is a list of persons wanted by law, those who have warrants for
their arrest. That list is given to us by the PNP (Philippine National Police),”
he said. The military is only assisting local police in law enforcement operations, he
said, adding that arrested fugitives are usually turned over to the nearest
police unit. “Although there is an ongoing ceasefire (with communist rebels), the AFP is
still doing checkpoint operations because that does not prohibit us from
fulfilling our mandate to the people,” Burgos said.
MalacaƱang has reminded the military that maintaining an order of battle is
now outlawed with the enactment of the Anti-Enforced Disappearance Act, which
President Aquino signed into law a few hours after he spoke at the 77th
anniversary of the AFP last Friday. Respect for human rights and humanitarian law, Burgos said, is at the heart
of the AFP’s new antiinsurgency project called IPSP (Internal Peace and Security
Plan) Bayanihan. “In all aspect of our military and security operations, first and foremost is
upholding the law and promoting international humanitarian laws. We also promote
respect for human rights in all levels of commands,” he said.
Human rights offices
According to Burgos, the AFP had established a human rights office not only
in its general headquarters in Camp Aguinaldo, but also in all its unified
command headquarters nationwide. “If there are violations of our soldiers, the public may help us by reporting
it to us. We will cooperate with the authorities and make sure the unit
concerned will make the personnel available for investigation,” he said.
In the radio interview, Sen. Panfilo Lacson said that as a former PNP chief,
he had encountered an order of battle of state enemies. He said he once ran into such list which contained the name of a government
official that intelligence reports linked to crimes like drugs and kidnapping.
“You would be surprised and wonder why the names of some personalities are
there,” he said in Filipino in an interview over dzBB Sunday. Pressed to explain, Lacson said he volunteered the observation “as a general
description.” “Sometimes, I would read an OB and tell myself, ‘Why, I had no clue this guy
would be doing this or that!’ Because there are instances no one would have an
inkling that a government official listed there would be involved in drugs and
kidnapping.”
Strictly confidential
Lacson said that after recovering from his initial shock, he would go through
the “accompanying summaries and information” and would realize that the person’s
inclusion in the OB “made sense.” He said an OB’s contents were not supposed to be released to media. “It is
like telegraphing the punches of the military and the Philippine National
Police,” he said. The senator said that putting together an order of battle involved the
intelligence networks of the military, the PNP and the National Bureau of
Investigation. He said there had been cases where names were included based on errors in
intelligence reporting. “The intelligence community can commit mistakes,” he
said. Lacson said the main purpose of an OB was to “guide” the military and the
police in identifying the personalities who deserved to be “covered by more
intelligence efforts.” “The OB gives a focus since there would be dossiers that provide material
pertaining to the activities and venues of the modus operandi of certain
people,” he noted. Trouble starts when the OB is abused or when protocol is not followed, he
said, particularly by “overeager law enforcement units or personalities.”
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/328977/afp-what-order-of-battle
While the AFP doesn't maintain "hit lists" of anti-government personalities, its probably a good bet that the military does have order of battle charts on insurgent and front group personalities. AFP assertions to the contrary seem a bit disingenuous. It will be interesting to see if the passage of this new law will influence intellligence organizations to revamp the way they do business. Given the relative impunity enjoyed by the military with regard to its human rights excesses, I'm skeptical that much will change.
ReplyDelete