Pulse Asia: December 2016 Nationwide Survey on Public Trust in Selected Countries and International Organizations

From Pulse Asia (Jan 12): December 2016 Nationwide Survey on Public Trust in Selected Countries and International Organizations

Pulse Asia Research, Inc. is pleased to share with you some findings on Public Trust in Selected Countries and International Organizations from the December 2016 Ulat ng Bayan national survey. We request you to assist us in informing the public by disseminating this information.

 

The survey fieldwork was conducted from December 6 – 11, 2016 using face-to-face interviews.

In the weeks leading up to and during the conduct of the interviews for this survey, the following developments preoccupied Filipinos:

1. The resignation of Vice-President Maria Leonor G. Robredo on 04 December 2016 as head of the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC) after being barred by President Rodrigo R. Duterte from attending Cabinet meetings due to “irreconcilable differences” between them, according to Cabinet Secretary Leoncio Evasco, Jr.; the latter would eventually be appointed to replace Vice-President Robredo as HUDCC Chairperson; also instructed not to attend Cabinet meetings was Commission on Higher Education (CHED) Chairperson Patricia Licuanan but despite this, the CHED Chairperson said she will stay on at the agency;
2. The decision of the Supreme Court (SC) by a vote of 9-5 (with one abstention) to dismiss the consolidated petitions arguing against the burial of former President Ferdinand E. Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani (LNMB); a week after the SC’s decision was made public, the remains of former President Marcos were laid to rest at the LNMB on 18 November 2016; various protest actions were held in Metro Manila and other parts of the country in the aftermath of the court ruling and the former President’s burial;
3. The investigation by the Senate and the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) into the killing of Albuera Mayor Rolando Espinosa, Sr. in his jail cell in Leyte on 05 November 2016 in the course of a search operation for drugs and firearms; after determining that the latter’s killing was a rubout, the NBI filed murder charges against reinstated Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG) Region 8 Director Marvin Marcos and 27 other individuals; Senator Panfilo Lacson, meanwhile, said he is convinced that the killing was premeditated and the application for a search warrant was done to give a semblance of legitimacy to the CIDG Region 8 operation; in a related development, the son of former Albuera Mayor Espinosa, Mr. Kerwin Espinosa, testified before the Senate and the House of Representatives that he gave money to Senator Leila M. de Lima to support her campaign for a Senate seat in the May 2016 elections through her driver, Mr. Ronnie Dayan;
4. For his part, President Duterte backed the police version of the events that led to the killing of Albuera Mayor Espinosa as he stated that he will not allow the police officers involved in the Leyte operation to be jailed; nonetheless, he vowed not to interfere in the legal proceedings against them;
5. The recommendation made by the Senate Committee on Justice to file kidnapping, murder, and perjury charges against Mr. Edgar Matobato, a self-confessed member of the so-called Davao Death Squad (DDS), who testified that President Duterte was directly involved in extrajudicial killings in Davao City while serving as its mayor; the Senate Committee also cleared the Duterte administration of any involvement in the extrajudicial killings which have occurred in the course of its war against illegal drugs; for his part, Mr. Matobato filed a criminal complaint against President Duterte before the Office of the Ombudsman for the President’s reported involvement in murder, kidnapping, torture, genocide, and other crimes against humanity while serving as mayor of Davao City;
6. The decision of the SC to clear three (3) judges included by President Duterte in one of his drug lists on the grounds that their being named as drug protectors was made “prematurely and without evidence” and that the High Court “found no prima facie case has been established against the said judges”;
7. President Duterte’s order to arrest gaming tycoon Mr. Jack Lam immediately on charges of bribery and economic sabotage after a raid conducted in his illegal casino operations in Clark, Pampanga on 24 November 2016 and claims made by Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II that a representative of Mr. Lam attempted to bribe him a few days after the raid; however, Bureau of Immigration (BI) records showed that Mr. Lam left for Hong Kong on 29 November 2016 and there are no records of him returning to the Philippines thereafter;
8. The Sandiganbayan’s acquittal of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and her husband as well as former Commission on Elections (COMELEC) Chairperson Benjamin Abalos, Sr. in connection with a second graft case filed against them stemming from the botched US$ 329-million ZTE national broadband network (NBN) deal; also acquitted of graft charges by the Sandiganbayan is former Makati City Mayor Elenita Binay in relation to the alleged overpriced purchase of furniture for the Makati City Hall in 1999;
9. The move of Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) Chairperson Jose Vicente Salazar to go on a one-month leave following allegations of corruption in his agency, specifically those raised by former ERC Director Francisco Villa, Jr. in three (3) letters written several months prior to committing suicide on 09 November 2016; in his letters, the former ERC Director said he was being pressured to approve procurement contracts and hire consultants without proper bidding and hiring procedures;
10. The appointment of Army Chief Lt. Gen. Eduardo Año as the successor of Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) Chief of Staff Ricardo Visaya; the new AFP Chief of Staff vowed to support the Duterte administration’s campaign against illegal drugs by ensuring that the necessary military capabilities will be extended to the police and other enforcement agencies to help bring down the country’s drug syndicates;
11. The observance of International Human Rights Day on 10 December 2016 amidst calls for the Duterte administration to end its violent war against illegal drugs which has resulted in nearly 6,000 deaths since July 2016;
12. The election of Mr. Donald Trump as the 45^th president of the United States (US) following his victory at the polls over former US State Secretary and Senator Hillary Clinton; after congratulating the US President-Elect, President Duterte said he will no longer quarrel with the US because Mr. Trump won the US presidential elections;
13. The impeachment of South Korean President Park Geun-hye arising from accusations of conspiring to extort US$ 69 million from big business in exchange for political favors such as granting presidential pardons to business leaders convicted of corruption charges; and
14. The weakening of the local currency versus the American dollar with the Philippine peso surpassing the P 49 mark on 17 November 2016 following expectations of an increase in US government spending strengthened the US dollar; the increase in headline inflation – due to higher prices of alcoholic beverages and tobacco, housing, water, electricity, gas, and transportation – which, at 2.5% in November 2016, is the highest it has been in 21 months, according to the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA).

As in our previous Ulat ng Bayan surveys, this nationwide survey is based on a sample of 1,200 representative adults 18 years old and above. It has a ± 3% error margin at the 95% confidence level. Subnational estimates for each of the geographic areas covered in the survey (i.e., Metro Manila, the rest of Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao) have a ± 6% error margin, also at 95% confidence level. Those interested in further technical details concerning the survey’s questionnaire and sampling design may request Pulse Asia Research in writing for fuller details, including copies of the pre-tested questions actually used.

 

Pulse Asia Research’s pool of academic fellows takes full responsibility for the design and conduct of the survey, as well as for analyses it makes based on the survey data. In keeping with our academic nature, no religious, political, economic, or partisan group influenced any of these processes. Pulse Asia Research undertakes Ulat ng Bayan surveys on its own without any party singularly commissioning the research effort.

 

For any clarification or questions, kindly contact Ronald D. Holmes, Pulse Asia Research President at 09189335497 or via email (ronald.holmes@gmail.com).

Trust is the majority sentiment toward the United States (76%) and Japan (70%) as well as the United Nations (74%); most Filipinos distrust China (61%), Russia (58%), and Great Britain (55%) while around the same percentage of Filipinos  either trust or distrust the European Union (50% versus 47%)

 

In December 2016, high majority trust ratings are obtained by the United States (76%) and Japan (70%). Trust[1] in both countries is the prevailing sentiment in every geographic area (69% to 83% and 58% to 76%, respectively) and socio-economic class (74% to 82% and 62% to 83%, respectively). Distrust[2] in the United States and Japan is expressed by 23% and 29% of Filipinos, respectively. Only 1% of Filipinos are either ambivalent on the matter[3] or refuse to state an opinion about the trustworthiness of these countries. (Please refer to Tables 1 and 2.)

 

 

On the other hand, more than half of Filipinos distrust Great Britain (55%), Russia (58%), and China (61%). Majorities in most geographic areas (53% to 68%) and all socio-economic groupings (52% to 62%) distrust Great Britain while the majority sentiment in Metro Manila is one of trust (55%). For its part, Russia registers majority distrust scores in the rest of Luzon (61%) and the Visayas (69%) as well as in every socio-economic class (56% to 65%) but it has virtually the same trust and distrust figures in Metro Manila (46% versus 50%) and Mindanao (50% versus 46%). In the case of China, it obtains majority distrust figures in almost all geographic areas and socio-economic groupings (60% to 67% and 60% to 70%, respectively), with Mindanao and Class ABC being the exceptions. In both subgroupings, China records essentially the same trust and distrust ratings (47% versus 50% and 48% versus 49%, respectively).

 

Meanwhile, the United Nations (UN) enjoys majority trust ratings not only at the national level (74%) but also across geographic areas and socio-economic classes (67% to 83% and 69% to 79%, respectively). A quarter of Filipinos (25%) distrust the organization while only 1% of Filipinos are undecided as regards the trustworthiness of the UN or refuse to express an opinion on the matter.  With respect to the European Union (EU), while 50% of Filipinos trust the organization, 47% do not. Indecision on the matter is expressed by 3% of Filipinos. Majorities in Metro Manila (60%), the rest of Luzon (51%), and Classes ABC and D (58% and 52%, respectively) trust the EU but most of those in the Visayas (56%), Mindanao (51%), and Class E (58%) are inclined to distrust the organization.

 

[1] This category includes those who have a great deal or a fair amount of trust in the countries and international organizations which are trust-rated in this survey.

[2] This category includes those who say they do not have much trust in these entities as well as those who do not trust them at all.

[3] This category includes those who are unable to state an opinion about the trustworthiness of these countries and international organizations, whether in terms of trust, indecision, or distrust.

 

http://www.pulseasia.ph/december-2016-nationwide-survey-on-public-trust-in-selected-countries-and-international-organizations/